New York Times “Reporter” Alluded to Wiretapping on Inauguration Day
The fake news propaganda machine is dismissing President Trump’s allegation that the Obama administration ordered wiretaps for Trump Tower to spy on him and his campaign associates. Trump’s allegation is being discharged as crazy by the DNC handmaidens at the fake news outlets, but if it is crazy why did a New York Times (NYT) “reporter” suggest in an article published on January 20, 2017, that intelligence agencies were wiretapping Trump’s associates?
In a NYT article titled Intercepted Russian Communications Part of Inquiry Into Trump Associates, the author, Michael S. Schmidt alludes to intelligence reports based on information gathered from wiretaps. The intelligence reports are related to an investigation by the deep state to prove that the Trump campaign had ties to Russia and colluded with Russian operatives to steal the election from Hillary Clinton. Schmidt wrote the following about the ongoing investigation of Trump and his associates’ ties to Russia:
The F.B.I. is leading the investigations, aided by the National Security Agency, the C.I.A. and the Treasury Department’s financial crimes unit. The investigators have accelerated their efforts in recent weeks but have found no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing, the officials said. One official said intelligence reports based on some of the wiretapped communications had been provided to the White House.
Schmidt is admitting that the agencies responsible for the investigation have gathered information from wiretapped communications. Did someone in the Obama administration leak to Schmidt that they are wiretapping Trump and his associates; where else did he get the information? Who was wiretapped? What type of data was provided to the White House before Obama’s departure? Are there Obama acolytes in the intelligence agencies providing information to Obama and fake news outlets?
During Obama’s lawless reign, his administration often used wiretaps to monitor people. The Gateway Pundit just published an abbreviated list of individuals and organizations who were spied on by the Obama administration. The following is the list that was originally released by Wikileaks:
- Bugged a private climate change strategy meeting between UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon and German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Berlin;
- Targeted the Chief of Staff of UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) for long term interception targeting his Swiss phone;
- Marked for surveillance the Director of the Rules Division of the World Trade Organization (WTO), Johann Human, and targeted his Swiss phone for long term interception.
The Obama administration also targeted Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Italy’s Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, and French President Nicolas Sarkozy. Is it ridiculous to believe that the Obama administration was using its usual espionage tactics to surveil a Republican presidential candidate and his campaign heads?
Do you remember the former CBS reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, who quit the network because the fake news outlet killed stories that painted Obama in a bad light? Attkisson claimed that after her resignation, she was spied on by a “government-related entity” that planted classified documents on her laptop. Attkisson says a source who arranged to have her computer checked for spyware discovered that her machine had been hacked. You can read the disturbing details of Attkisson’s ordeal in her memoir. Attkisson makes it clear that the source, who’s “connected to government three-letter agencies,” who checked her laptop told her the computer was hacked into by “a sophisticated entity that used commercial, nonattributable spyware that’s proprietary to a government agency: either the CIA, FBI, the Defense Intelligence Agency or the National Security Agency.” How absurd is President Trump’s claim that Obama wiretapped his campaign headquarters at Trump Tower?
The Democrat Party is a criminal organization that routinely uses Soviet-style tactics to spy on its enemies and monitor people to verify their progressive credentials; wiretapping is an indispensable tactic. Why wouldn’t the Obama administration spy on the insurgent candidate who promised to ‘drain the swamp?’